Posts: 36
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation:
4
12-18-2009, 03:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-18-2009, 04:19 PM by heretician.)
Aww please someone help, I need to know if I should replace this crap
-- After testing my new GeForce with Dirt 2, it does seem SLIGHTLY slower, but it may just be a placebo of me thinking my old video card is worse. I even bought a DVI cable for this new video card.. The GeForce is like 3 years newer than the x1600, can it possibly still be worse? I mean even the framing on the x1600 is messed; but it still plays my games.
AIM - c90tre
MSN - onealns@email.uc.edu
Posts: 107
Threads: 12
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation:
0
The 8400gs has pixel shader model of 4, while x1600 has 3, they both have nearly same core speed and wouldn't look at speed in this case, they both have 512 mb of video ram. The release date of 8400gs is on 2007 and newer than x1600. 8400gs has HD technology which is an advance. SO, in terms of specifications i find 8400gs is better. And in terms of performance and practical use have no idea because i never used these two cards before, i still have an old ati driver.
Posts: 192
Threads: 9
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation:
6
NVIDIA would be the way to go.
Posts: 48
Threads: 13
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation:
1
ATi Radeon X1600 Pro PCI-E
Why will you get GeForce 8400..
The cheapest you wanna get is GeForce 9500GT
Posts: 55
Threads: 2
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation:
0
First of all, how money do you want to spend? And I recommend to you the NVIDIA SERIES 9XXX
Posts: 603
Threads: 27
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation:
2
12-29-2009, 08:23 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-29-2009, 08:23 AM by MarkW7.)
I have the 8400GS in my second rig, it was my main card, it can run CSS and The Sims 3 pretty easily.