Lock our own threads...

[Nemmyy]

Why can't we lock our own threads? I personally don't need it but it would lighten the load on mods/staff and I always see a lot of people asking for threads to be locked once their question is answered.

[Effectzz]

I would support this suggestion IF everyone would use this feature responsibly and maturely.

Effectzz.

[ΣΠΤΣR SHΦΚΔRΦ]

+1
I'm for this suggestion.

[Natha]

Hello.

Yeah, but i think this should be for VIP only, because to be honest, this is just like HF, UB3R can lock their own thread, and locking your own thread is a moderators job really.

But i guess i could support this, its up to Omniscient.

thanks

-Natha

[Nemmyy]

Or at least have an option to clearly state that your thread is answered...or people could just change the title but most are too lazy. Regardless, I think locking your own thread would be easier and I don't really see how people could abuse it.

[Emotion]

Hi, Nemmyy.

I don't think this is a good idea, although I know it would make the Staff's job easier but if you think again, how many people would abuse it?

[Extasey]

Hello.

Yeah, but i think this should be for VIP only, because to be honest, this is just like HF, UB3R can lock their own thread, and locking your own thread is a moderators job really.

But i guess i could support this, its up to Omniscient.

thanks

-Natha

What defines VIP?

[UrugEci]

I would support this suggestion IF everyone would use this feature responsibly and maturely.

Effectzz.

.....bc we can all abuse locking a done thread right ?

[Effectzz]

.....bc we can all abuse locking a done thread right ?

Some people would find a way. But I think this idea might work.

Effectzz.

[Elektrisk]

There is no "VIP" as someone suggested earlier, nor is there any plan for such a thing to be implemented. To be honest, having to lock people's threads for them isn't that big of a deal. It's not like HF, where there're hundreds of reports at any given time. It's up to Omniscient.