When will the groups come?

[Sam]

Do I get a cookie? Sorry off-topic.

Let's just await a reply from Omni.

[C4Vendetta]

Exactly what groups do you feel we need?

None at the moment. But I was more wodering if there will be groups ppl can make, and if they would get offcial if they are good and stuff...

Now there isn't enough ativity I guess.

[daneasaur]

I don't see the point in groups. If you look at the groups over in HF, they are barely used compared to other boards.

The RAT's Crew : 475 Threads
Black Knights : 340 Threads
Graphic Masters : 337 Threads
PhilKer : 244 Threads
The Gamers : 165 Threads
D.S. Inc : 158 Threads

------------------------

Visual Basic and .NET Framework : 6,790 Threads
Hacking Tools and Programs : 22,108 Threads

[hexon]

But threads in groups are more organised than those in subthreads

[Notorious Mental]

Groups are just a not good idea at this moment. The sections here cover almost everything this site is about, I don't see a point in groups.

[Gone]

Imho groups are bad. I like the concept of open groups, like facebook, but not requirements ones. The precedence takes place. Imho thats the last thing we need on SF, favourtism.

[Tierney]

Imho groups are bad. I like the concept of open groups, like facebook, but not requirements ones. The precedence takes place. Imho thats the last thing we need on SF, favourtism.

Open groups is the best idea on here. Go open groups!

[Omniscient]

If I add groups there won't be subforums for them. I'll consider it. I know people are into the groups and I'd like to think pleasing the crowd is sometimes a good idea. My best guess is that a Graphics Group would be next.

[Support]

No, Omni. Let us make the groups ourselves.

[Elektrisk]

No, Omni. Let us make the groups ourselves.

That requires admin privileges.