Support Forums › Categories › Webmaster Support › Web Hosting
Light HTTPD vs Apache

Poll: What would you choose
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Apache
100.00%
 5 100.00%
LightHTTPD
0%
 0 0%
Total 5 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Threaded Mode
Light HTTPD vs Apache
OX!DE Offline
Learner
*
Posts: 7
Threads: 5
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 0
#1
03-27-2010, 11:27 AM
What is better? What would you use? Why?
Find
Reply
Omniscient Offline
Win By Attrition
*******
Administrators
Posts: 1,778
Threads: 163
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 218
#2
03-27-2010, 01:44 PM
Apache is going to offer more extensibility, support, and compatibility.

Lighttpd is going to offer better scalability and efficiency.

You can also run both where lighttpd is the load balancer in front of an apache process.

Also Apache 2.2 imho is the most viable option for an httpd server.
Superman I am here to rescue you.
This is Support Forums not Support PMs.  Do not PM me for support unless it's private and site related.
Website Find
Reply
Cida Offline
Web programmer
***
Posts: 105
Threads: 3
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 4
#3
03-27-2010, 02:04 PM
I voted Apache, but I've never tried LightHTTPD, only Apache, so it's not really something to depend on, as I have nothing to compare to.
Find
Reply
Kaleb Offline
Regular Member
***
Posts: 158
Threads: 18
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 1
#4
04-05-2010, 06:14 PM
I go apache, better of the two Imo.
Find
Reply
timestandstill Offline
Regular Member
***
Posts: 158
Threads: 24
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 1
#5
04-07-2010, 01:07 PM
Apache. Perhaps nginx if you have extreme traffic.
Find
Reply
4EVERPROXY Offline
Learner
*
Posts: 15
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 0
#6
04-08-2010, 02:02 AM
I am forced to say Apache just for the simple reason i have not used anything else. One thing in which i dont like is that in newer versions of Apache they have made a hard limit of 256 max clients in which i had to figure out how to change. Most people would say that would be enough but i host proxies and need an odd configuration.
Find
Reply
Swift Swim Offline
Regular Member
***
Posts: 148
Threads: 22
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 0
#7
04-08-2010, 02:07 AM
Like mos tpeople here I voted apache as its the only one I've ever used.
Find
Reply
Яichie Offline
Regular Member
***
Posts: 120
Threads: 5
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 0
#8
04-11-2010, 12:13 PM
Apache, basically most reasons Omni gave.
Find
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is Litespeed ssd hosting faster than Apache? Kdstack 7 824 01-18-2017, 02:49 AM
Last Post: Mirandas
  Looking for VPS SSD Hosting for Light traffic Backend Site Mirandas 4 608 03-05-2015, 02:21 AM
Last Post: Tilsun
  HosTWitter.Com - Nginx/Apache Cpanel Optimzed Servers Stating @ 3.49$ | NL/U.S.A/Ger! hostwitter 0 673 09-29-2012, 03:04 AM
Last Post: hostwitter
  Supremebytes | Cheap, Professional Website Hosting | cPanel, Apache, PHP, MySQL pcloadletter 0 616 03-14-2010, 01:52 PM
Last Post: pcloadletter

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)