06-19-2011, 09:12 PM
(06-19-2011, 08:11 PM)Annuit Coeptis Wrote: Ha, that would be a good idea. Yeah, I do notice that eset has a lot of false positives but in retrospect would you rather have false positives or an AV that misses some stuff?
I thought someone might say that if I mentioned false positives, however I do have more respect for Norton and Bitdefender in that regard. Because they actually have developers that can determine what is malicious and what is not with their code. Personally for me, i'd rather have an AV that doesn't have a bunch of them. I have knowledge to easily fix intrusions myself though, so for others it may be different and they aren't able to take that risk.