Posts: 851
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
21
It was only for a couple of minutes; no need to bring up a thread about this. We take for granted how often this site is online, rather than offline. Have you seen all those threads from Hack Forums about the downtime? We should be thanking Omniscient.
Posts: 5,793
Threads: 268
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
85
I don't think it should be quite as far as thanking him for the downtime. Regardless of whether it was caused by him or not based on server issues or planned maintenance downtime. If that happened to a website like google, I don't think people would thank google for having their search engine down, even if it was just for 5 minutes. It's common for people to take for granted that the site is up most of the time, but that's what all webmasters strive for; A maximum uptime.
Posts: 851
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
21
Let's consider the fact that Google has hundreds of billions of dollars to maintain their up time. I'm sure they won't have a problem keeping it online.
And I do agree with your last statement, that webmasters strive for maximum up time, but I say five minutes isn't bad. Considering the fact that Omniscient is the only one running this entire website, I find it quite impressing how often Support Forums is online.
Posts: 114
Threads: 10
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
2
I had a low downtime here so didnt really affect me.
Posts: 644
Threads: 16
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation:
43
It's because CloudFlare is just awful.