New Signature !

[Mous]

Too much things are presented in that signature randomly.
Your main render "joker" has light, but that does not go with the overall light of the signature.
You should place a light source somewhere up, to match the light on the joker.

Text is looking cool, but placing could be worked on.

I would say loose the money, loose those red C4D's and the fire.

Blending isn't working at all and never use white borders on a signature.

This is the picture without money, red, and fire.
Looks like I don't need Photoshop, I guess.

Spoiler (Click to View)

The red lighting against the buildings is supposed to look like
the fire is giving off light, since the entire "city" is on fire.
Also, I'd rather match the lighting with my border than use more red.
I can't u see a black border, because the entire picture is already black on the edges.
This is the picture *without* burn and doge, Which is way too bright.
Also, because of the money,l I can't really use the blur tool to create depth, you can't see
that I actually *did* blur the picture. If you compare the two, though, the lights are dimmer on the one
in my signature.

Spoiler (Click to View)

[RDCA]

It looks pretty nice, good job. But the text should be a bit closer the stock.

[Mous]

It looks pretty nice, good job. But the text should be a bit closer the stock.

Not sure I can. If I did the text would be behind the money.

EDIT: I was wrong. There are 3 copies of the render (The Joker)
then the text, then the fire (Which doesn't cover any of the stock)
Then the stock, then the money. So that's as close to the stock as the text can get.

[GrammarPhreak]

I had a signature just like this the other day, but I left the money layer out. I made the lights come on (fading in) as they became closer.

Nice piece of work though,

[Cybr]

I like the text, but the render does not go with the signature at all.

[Mous]

I like the text, but the render does not go with the signature at all.

xD the original picture is the same building/joker.

I rendered the joker out of the picture and layered him to add other stuff.

[Skawz]

9/10 i like it a lot!

[NekoChan]

IF you can't take criticism do not post.

[Mous]

IF you can't take criticism do not post.

Looks who's talking, Mr. I-negative-rep-people-for-their-opinion.

I'm trying to find ways to incorporate what people say, but I'm not sure how,
so I ask tell them what I did in the picture that makes their criticism not make sense.

Explain how I put the text closer to the stock when the text is the layer on top of the stock?

Also, explain how I remove the red/fire/money when those are
the only extra layers on the picture aside from 3 or 4 renders/stocks?

that would only make sense if you're telling me to redo the entire picture.

inb4 he tells me to redo the entire picture just because he's got no foothold in
the conversation.

[DaBaws]

I like the backgrounds, but the render doesn't fit very well in my oppinion.
Other than that, it's pretty cool!