(04-05-2010, 04:48 PM).D0T Wrote: Again, I would disagree. But we're all entitled to our own opinion.I agree with you on the Avast! runtime detection. It has high detection rates.
But Avast is also good. Great runtime protection.
Here is some information to back-up my clams about MalwareBytes Run-Time detection.
Quote:Using 50 positive and unique malware samples, the real-time protection by CounterSpy perform better than Malwarebytes. CounterSpy’s Active Protection has caught 18 out of 50 samples while MBAM’s real-time protection only caught 1 out of 50 but not during the transfer. MBAM's real-time protection only worked when I opened the folder containing the 50 samples.(CounterSpy was just another product being tested.)
[/quote]
Doesn't mean it's bad, but I think it's still good.
I use Avast! for runtime and MBAM for scanning (monthly)