Poll: What would you choose
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Apache
100.00%
5 100.00%
LightHTTPD
0%
0 0%
Total 5 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Light HTTPD vs Apache
#2
Apache is going to offer more extensibility, support, and compatibility.

Lighttpd is going to offer better scalability and efficiency.

You can also run both where lighttpd is the load balancer in front of an apache process.

Also Apache 2.2 imho is the most viable option for an httpd server.
Superman I am here to rescue you.
This is Support Forums not Support PMs.  Do not PM me for support unless it's private and site related.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Light HTTPD vs Apache - by OX!DE - 03-27-2010, 11:27 AM
RE: Light HTTPD vs Apache - by Omniscient - 03-27-2010, 01:44 PM
RE: Light HTTPD vs Apache - by Cida - 03-27-2010, 02:04 PM
RE: Light HTTPD vs Apache - by Kaleb - 04-05-2010, 06:14 PM
RE: Light HTTPD vs Apache - by timestandstill - 04-07-2010, 01:07 PM
RE: Light HTTPD vs Apache - by 4EVERPROXY - 04-08-2010, 02:02 AM
RE: Light HTTPD vs Apache - by Swift Swim - 04-08-2010, 02:07 AM
RE: Light HTTPD vs Apache - by Яichie - 04-11-2010, 12:13 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is Litespeed ssd hosting faster than Apache? Kdstack 7 826 01-18-2017, 02:49 AM
Last Post: Mirandas
  Looking for VPS SSD Hosting for Light traffic Backend Site Mirandas 4 613 03-05-2015, 02:21 AM
Last Post: Tilsun
  HosTWitter.Com - Nginx/Apache Cpanel Optimzed Servers Stating @ 3.49$ | NL/U.S.A/Ger! hostwitter 0 673 09-29-2012, 03:04 AM
Last Post: hostwitter
  Supremebytes | Cheap, Professional Website Hosting | cPanel, Apache, PHP, MySQL pcloadletter 0 616 03-14-2010, 01:52 PM
Last Post: pcloadletter

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)