12-26-2009, 09:55 PM
Mmm, I personally wouldn't go with that, but I'm used to running pretty "hardcore" applications.
I would aim for something that is Dual core, minimum 1.8GHZ. 1.6 is too slow. If you get a dual core ATOM it may be decent. As the range is from about .8 to 2 GHZ. But a dual 1.6 should be sufficient. I have used a single 1.6 and its crap, so crap.
The main thing about those processors is the power management. They are very power efficient when used correctly.
I would aim for something that is Dual core, minimum 1.8GHZ. 1.6 is too slow. If you get a dual core ATOM it may be decent. As the range is from about .8 to 2 GHZ. But a dual 1.6 should be sufficient. I have used a single 1.6 and its crap, so crap.
The main thing about those processors is the power management. They are very power efficient when used correctly.