04-05-2012, 06:46 PM
(04-05-2012, 06:04 PM)Cronus Wrote: What's your definition of spam? Not all posts were LQ. Infact, the majority were of standard quality. I agree that most should have contributed more by opening threads, and such, but they chose to reply to the current available threads instead. I also know that most of the posts were not support related, but you can't obtain 100 support posts, because not enough people request support.What's your definition of standard? Are you referring to the quality of posts made by users like Peter L? Or are you thinking of, erm.... the same quality as some of the other regulars? I've noticed that although the style some regulars and newbies are posting with is alright, keeping up with a steady character count and decent English, I have a problem with the content; they seem to be either re-commenting on a previously mentioned statement, or including some other generic filler.
Quaero gloria stellarum.