Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Low Quality Content..
#8
(05-18-2011, 04:44 PM)Brandenx781 Wrote: I just say that maybe Support Forums was just an add-on, just to get the Support Feather. There's not much done here. We have nothing. We only have like 3-4 groups, unlike HF where it has tons of active groups. We have a few awards where rarely anyone gets an award, unlike HF where they have tons of awards.

Let me ask you this. So, why can't they have the "Hack Feather" so we can go onto Hack Forums and get that? It should balance each other out.

So. Omnicient if you do read this post. What are you going to do?

The Support Feather is given to HF members who help increase the overall post/member/popularity of this site. I would imagine when Support Forums becomes a reasonably big forum with regular posts and threads omni will remove it. A Hack feather is unnecessary for support forums due to the fact that there is no need to increase popularity of Hackforums.

Due to this site being so small there is not need for much maintenance, Hackforums is always in the firing line with DDOS attacks, omni dealing with l33t's and Ub3r purchases etc. So most attention needs to faced there which is why you don't see new things being added here.

quote
We only have like 3-4 groups, unlike HF where it has tons of active groups.

Hackforums has tons of active groups because it has tons of active members to join them
.
quote
We have a few awards where rarely anyone gets an award, unlike HF where they have tons of awards.

They have loads of awards but that doesn't mean to say that are tons are given out. The only easily obtainable ones are the donation awards, ub3r award and the support feather.


(05-18-2011, 04:46 PM)Laugh Wrote: H-boy that is how it is supposed to work. The ratio is too great in the case. The ratio of spammers to HQ member. You have good members, than you have flamers, spammers, bots, support feather seekers, and people asking about HF being down. You can see the separation.

I honestly think Solidus and Skill can "handle" reports, bots, and spammers for the most part...but they simply cannot make people high quality or delete many pointless threads per day in order to make it work. The hole is just getting deeper on here.

The main problem is that if you could remove them and make it a forum where there is nothing but high quality members you would have more sections then members who are able to fill them therefore the site popularity would dramatically decrease leaving a dead forum.

[Image: sinaturee.png]


Messages In This Thread
Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-18-2011, 04:10 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Solidus - 05-18-2011, 04:14 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by h-boy - 05-18-2011, 04:38 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Brandenx781 - 05-18-2011, 04:44 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-18-2011, 04:46 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Brandenx781 - 05-18-2011, 04:55 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-18-2011, 05:02 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by h-boy - 05-18-2011, 05:02 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Brandenx781 - 05-18-2011, 05:11 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-18-2011, 05:10 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-18-2011, 10:41 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-18-2011, 10:50 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-19-2011, 02:16 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-19-2011, 05:35 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Gaijin - 05-19-2011, 06:00 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-19-2011, 06:13 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by h-boy - 05-19-2011, 07:35 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Brandenx781 - 05-19-2011, 01:45 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Jacob - 05-19-2011, 08:45 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-19-2011, 09:07 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Injection - 05-19-2011, 09:10 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-19-2011, 09:44 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Jacob - 05-19-2011, 10:46 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-19-2011, 11:00 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-20-2011, 02:00 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-20-2011, 07:04 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-20-2011, 07:39 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-20-2011, 07:43 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Epicly - 05-20-2011, 07:55 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-20-2011, 08:07 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Epicly - 05-22-2011, 10:04 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-20-2011, 09:01 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Tha Sneak - 05-20-2011, 09:21 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-20-2011, 09:31 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-21-2011, 02:36 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Virtue - 05-21-2011, 04:40 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Gaijin - 05-21-2011, 05:40 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Tha Sneak - 05-21-2011, 06:35 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-21-2011, 05:38 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Sam - 05-21-2011, 06:49 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-21-2011, 09:08 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Gaijin - 05-21-2011, 11:33 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Fragma - 05-21-2011, 11:57 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Cybr - 05-21-2011, 12:10 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by ★Cooldude★ - 05-21-2011, 12:30 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-21-2011, 06:56 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Invincible - 05-21-2011, 08:26 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by F.ate - 05-21-2011, 09:24 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-21-2011, 09:52 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-22-2011, 05:37 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Mao - 05-21-2011, 10:50 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Fragma - 05-22-2011, 06:27 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by :'( - 05-22-2011, 06:28 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-22-2011, 06:37 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Fragma - 05-22-2011, 06:38 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-22-2011, 06:56 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-22-2011, 07:34 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Mao - 05-24-2011, 02:58 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by WhiteFlame - 05-22-2011, 09:20 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-22-2011, 12:04 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-23-2011, 01:13 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by G0dfath3r - 05-23-2011, 11:38 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-24-2011, 12:45 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Omniscient - 05-24-2011, 12:55 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Ultimate look from quality content paper for your hand Clarencetew24 0 842 05-19-2017, 03:57 AM
Last Post: Clarencetew24
  HF Content Sam 8 2,461 09-10-2011, 10:16 AM
Last Post: Sam
  Invisible low quality posting? WirelessWave 9 2,014 07-13-2010, 07:20 PM
Last Post: Canoris

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)