03-15-2011, 06:05 PM
(03-15-2011, 05:48 PM)Mous Wrote: I'm pretty sure that OP related the lack of a belief in "God" and science
together. That was the entire reason I started saying "you can't prove
God with science". Maybe you should actually read the thread.
My point still remains valid, why are atheists exempt from having to provide
proof of God's non-existence?
The only way that someone would think that is if they took that
statement as an unalienable fact. "We don't have to prove God doesn't
exist, because him not existing is so OBVIOUS." That's like saying "I know
what *insert word* means!" but when asked to provide an explanation
the reply is "I don't have to! I don't want you to know!"
As I said, the burden of proof doesn't lie with Atheists, the religious people making illogical claims need to prove those claims. It`s just like walking into a court room and saying Stephen Hawkings raped you, you better bring some evidence because that`s a pretty tall tale.