Norton versus Kaspersky

[C!RCU!T tr0jAn ☠]

I would have to go with Kaspersky.

EDIT: lol at the poll.

[Statics]

Kaspersky is waaaaaaaaaaaay better than Norton because it was like the best antivirus ever in 2009.

[flAmingw0rm]

I had both of them, Norton and Kaspersky. And I think Kaspersky is better, while I had it, I had no viruses, my computer was really fast while with Norton it was lagging .. when I try to delete a virus exactly.

My vote goes to Kaspersky.

Edit: 18-0 for Kaspersky, lol. Nice poll there.

[Common]

I don't know much about Kapersky, but I hate Norton with a passion. I used to have it, and it never used to detect anything (except the 'tracking cookies'), which annoyed the heck out of me. On top of that, Norton used to slow down my system so much, when I uninstalled it, my system sped up by 70%.

So my vote goes to Kapersky, because anything must be better than Norton.

[Shinkirou]

Hah, poor Norton, not even one vote.
The only thing I have against Kapersky is the fact that it's a system hog, and that isn't a major problem just a minor annoyance.

[MyFolder]

I use Kaspersky.. Poor Norton, not even a single vote..

[Tank]

Yes.... I am so glad this forum is not littered with idiots.

N360 aka, Norton, is the, 100%, WORSE, most SHITTY A/V / ANYTHING ever invented.

I could code a better AV in damn .net. -_-