Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MODERATOR PLEASE DELETE, DISCUSSION COMPLETED
#31
To be honest, I find it rather funny how you guys call me the immature one when you people are reacting in such a weird way for a suggestion just grow up, and I am now not just suggesting that it's for aged groups It can effect religions to.
[Image: signaturera.png]
#32
I get what you are saying..it looks immature. But it is not 'sexual.'
#33
Can we like close this thread, because it's not getting us anywhere. The community already decided basically. And I sense a flame war about to begin.
HJT Team. Deltron <3 RDCA <3 Quintus <3
#34
That's not sexual, just sexy, but that's beside the point. It does not show anything you cannot see in the street, legally at least, so why shouldn't it be allowed on the internet were we have videos of 18 year old girls having sex.
#35
RDCA, as I've said, it does not matter what it shows or what it means, all I'm saying is basically it can be classed as sexual/hurtful to religions and some age groups.
[Image: signaturera.png]
#36
(06-02-2011, 07:27 PM)Laughynose Wrote: To be honest, I find it rather funny how you guys call me the immature one when you people are reacting in such a weird way for a suggestion just grow up, and I am now not just suggesting that it's for aged groups It can effect religions to.

No one called you immature, I just said it was a part of growing up. You can't keep people locked away from the reality of human nature. And also, we're not here to abide by any religion either. They should be respected, but in such an indirect way just is unheard of on a forum unless it's specifically related to religion.
#37
I think it is great your suggesting things to keep our forum professional and appropriate for all ages but this censoring images that barely expose anything is not the right way to do that.
[Image: ictcbw.gif]
#38
(06-02-2011, 07:31 PM)Laughynose Wrote: RDCA, as I've said, it does not matter what it shows or what it means, all I'm saying is basically it can be classed as sexual/hurtful to religions and some age groups.
You must be 13 to be a member of this site. Hence some cleavage is allowed, pornographic content is not.

#39
(06-02-2011, 07:33 PM)RDCA Wrote: You must be 13 to be a member of this site. Hence some cleavage is allowed, pornographic content is not.

I agree but I'm thinking also of the religions that might be effected by it to.
[Image: signaturera.png]
#40
(06-02-2011, 07:36 PM)Laughynose Wrote: I agree but I'm thinking also of the religions that might be effected by it to.
What religion would you be referring to.


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Sorry for 2 thread but u can delete after we will solve ? WhiteLine 6 1,385 04-30-2012, 02:56 AM
Last Post: Kewlz
  Idea Discussion: SF Weekly World News BlackChaos 22 5,156 03-30-2012, 02:31 PM
Last Post: BlackChaos
  Allow members to junk/close/delete own threads & posts. D3xus 27 6,077 02-18-2012, 12:06 AM
Last Post: Julia Gillard
  Delete the w3c validation forum D3xus 5 1,429 11-28-2011, 10:55 AM
Last Post: D3xus
  Moderator Applications Omniscient 391 176,800 09-26-2011, 06:34 PM
Last Post: BreShiE

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)