Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - Printable Version +- Support Forums (https://www.supportforums.net) +-- Forum: Categories (https://www.supportforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=87) +--- Forum: Life Support (https://www.supportforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +---- Forum: Academic, School, and Homework Help (https://www.supportforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=52) +---- Thread: Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) (/showthread.php?tid=7138) Pages:
1
2
|
Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - notLuke - 05-18-2010 2 = 1 Proof Let us use basic algebraic proofs. We begin by using X and Y as any rational value. Let X and Y be equal values: X = Y Multiply boths sides by X: X2 = XY Subtract boths sides with Y2: X2 - Y2 = XY - Y2 Factor each side: (X - Y)(X + Y) = Y(X - Y) Divide by (X - Y) X + Y = Y Since X = Y, substitute Y with X: X + X = X Simplify 2X = X Divide by X 2 = 1 I got sent this by one of my A-level students. My reply was as follows; Unfortunately this is not true. The error arises when you have to divide both sides by (X – Y). If you go back to your original assumption. That X and Y are equal, the X – Y must equal zero. You are therefore dividing by zero, which is something you cannot do. Try doing something divided by zero on your calculator and it will come up with ‘syntax error’. Please post your comments RE: Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - Peter L - 05-18-2010 My question is, how is that solving anything? You can't just multiply both sides, then factor them, then divide them, etc. For the first step, you'd divide because it's a multiplication problem. RE: Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - notLuke - 05-18-2010 Well, exactly. That's what I told him. It's rushed. RE: Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - υℓqυισяяα - 05-18-2010 Haha... must have cracked up aristortle. And no, when you divide by 0 the calculator gives math error. Because anything divided by 0 is infinity, which is too large for a puny calculator. RE: Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - notLuke - 05-19-2010 (05-18-2010, 05:39 AM)SkullTraill Wrote: Haha... must have cracked up aristortle. And no, when you divide by 0 the calculator gives math error. Because anything divided by 0 is infinity, which is too large for a puny calculator. Exactly RE: Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - lunagron - 05-20-2010 (05-18-2010, 04:43 AM)notLuke Wrote: Try doing something divided by zero on your calculator and it will come up with ‘syntax error’. My calculator actually says "divide by zero error" and then it shuts off. (Not a joke) RE: Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - alfonzo1955 - 05-22-2010 (05-18-2010, 05:39 AM)SkullTraill Wrote: Haha... must have cracked up aristortle. And no, when you divide by 0 the calculator gives math error. Because anything divided by 0 is infinity, which is too large for a puny calculator. No, anything divided by zero is undefined, it could be called infinity but in a mathematical sense it is undefined. RE: Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - lunagron - 05-23-2010 (05-22-2010, 06:14 AM)alfonzo1955 Wrote: No, anything divided by zero is undefined, it could be called infinity but in a mathematical sense it is undefined.Technically it is a complex infinity. RE: Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - robbiecee2 - 06-07-2010 (05-18-2010, 04:47 AM)RadianTRusH Wrote: My question is, how is that solving anything? You can't just multiply both sides, then factor them, then divide them, etc. For the first step, you'd divide because it's a multiplication problem. agreed RE: Proof that 2=1 (<- and proof that this is false) - notLuke - 06-18-2011 Just thought I'd bump this thread and get it a little more attention. Any thoughts on this? |