The title says it all, vote on the poll about which movie is better and leave your comments as a reply!
My vote: Iron Man 2 all the way, they had more characters and the addition of another two suits was awesome!
I did not see the first part, but the second part was kind of disappointing.
The fight vs. this guy was way to short.
Hello;
I preferred Iron Man 1 because it was interesting how he setup his life, how he ran it, and how he practiced his work; Iron Man 2 was just a series of battles and scenarios. I feel Iron Man 2 could've been put together a bit better.
I loved both of them though, they were both incredibly enjoyable.
-LS
(05-15-2010, 02:00 PM)s1N Wrote: [ -> ]I did not see the first part, but the second part was kind of disappointing.
The fight vs. this guy was way to short.
The fights could have been a lot more epic, but overall still a good movie.
(05-15-2010, 02:27 PM)Lord_Scorch Wrote: [ -> ]Hello;
I preferred Iron Man 1 because it was interesting how he setup his life, how he ran it, and how he practiced his work; Iron Man 2 was just a series of battles and scenarios. I feel Iron Man 2 could've been put together a bit better.
I loved both of them though, they were both incredibly enjoyable.
-LS
Now that you mention it, they could have added more of a sort of story feeling to Iron Man 2 and that would have made it better.
(05-15-2010, 03:41 PM)Control Wrote: [ -> ]2 the best one
I agree, what made the second movie better than the first in your mind?
idk...i liked iron man 1 better for all the quality in the screens..
I've never seen Iron Man 1 (Yeah.. I know) but I feel that Iron Man 2 lacked a strong story. Some scenarios were rather obvious and original. Nonetheless, it was a great movie.
I liked them both, however the fact that Rhodes was played by a different person annoyed me a bit.
I think Don Cheadle (Iron Man 2) was better than Terrence Howard (Iron Man 1) though.
I liked Iron Man 2 better and I think it would have been better if Terrence Howard played Rhodes.