I've never really played CoD MW2, but my brother has started playing it in favor of Halo 3 and it looks a lot funner. Not to mention it's more realistic. On Halo 3, you can get shot 50000 times and not die, but on CoD, all it takes is a couple of shots. The perks are an amazing concept too.
I prefer Call of Duty 6: Modern Warfare 2 ... only my opinion
MW2 takes NO skill, whatsoever.
Modern Warfare 2 all the way
.
(04-06-2010, 05:17 AM)Heli0s Wrote: [ -> ]Come on, they're two very different FPS's. If they were even somewhat similar, this would be an even contest.
I agree.
Call of Duty is based on WAR
Halo is based on Hitech guns & Aliens.
My vote definately goes to Call of Duty 6: Modern Warfare 2 because it is better than Halo 3.
(04-06-2010, 01:06 PM)Currymanz™ Wrote: [ -> ]My vote definately goes to Call of Duty 6: Modern Warfare 2 because it is better than Halo 3.
Yea. If I where too choose as well I would say Modern Warfare 2.
(04-06-2010, 07:10 AM)PaaYbAAcK Wrote: [ -> ]In my opinion MW2 beats halo everyday, and those saying MW2 requires no skills says it because they get killed all time.
That's why MLG tournaments with $20,000 prizes are for Halo 3 not COD.
COD doesn't require skill, just pull the trigger for 2 seconds and spray your RPD and you've got it.
The only thing that requires skill is sniping, but even then, Halo 3 sniping is more difficult.
H3 > CoD
It's been explained in previous posts - H3 requires more skill.
No question about it, Halo is only for xbox 360 and i also played it but never did like it, I think modern warfare 2 is the real winner here no questions asked
.