(11-17-2009, 06:58 PM)[H]atsune[M]iku Wrote: [ -> ]People say the running 2 AV's side by side could cause conflicts though.
Yes heard that too.
In my opinion both are good. I would go for Avast although.
I think that AVG is good because it has a more freindly feel to it.
But i think that avast is the best because it finds more problems for me, as less false positives.
Yeah, I use both when behind windows. Along with Ad-Aware and Spybot Search and Destroy.
(11-17-2009, 02:05 PM)Fail Ninja Wrote: [ -> ]Avast by Far, Finds more viruses and less false positives. I have never being infected using Avast.
I have never been infected using AVG.
Really, you need to form your own opinion. The argument could go on for years over anti-virus combinations and packages.
Ultimately, its up to the user to decide what (s)he likes best.
(11-16-2009, 05:22 PM)NaK Wrote: [ -> ]I choose Avast
I agreed..!! I've using avast for a year and it never took me down.
(12-08-2009, 02:10 AM)Extasey Wrote: [ -> ]Really, you need to form your own opinion. The argument could go on for years over anti-virus combinations and packages.
Ultimately, its up to the user to decide what (s)he likes best.
LOL. You are right. It depends to the user to decide which one is the best for him.
AVG is indeed user friendly, but isn't really that Hacker-Friendly.. Avast would be the best bet. However, I personally use AntiVir.
Both are no good IMHO, i use Avira Premium (well worth the £10) lifetime purchase!
avast but in combo with mbam