I think this site is Ok how it is without needing Staff because the site itself is kind of inactive, and he shouldn't need to check on it 24/7 with the staff he already Has on it. He is also looking after Hf and has his real life, so why would he when he is already busy. Just stating an opinion that he is ok with who he has currently
(03-29-2012, 09:23 AM)Julia Gillard Wrote: [ -> ]I think this site is Ok how it is without needing Staff because the site itself is kind of inactive, and he shouldn't need to check on it 24/7 with the staff he already Has on it. He is also looking after Hf and has his real life, so why would he when he is already busy. Just stating an opinion that he is ok with who he has currently
There is nobody currently.
(03-28-2012, 10:43 AM)Grin Wrote: [ -> ]I think Omni himself is staff plenty.
I agree. If I actually find a legitimate reason to have more staff members, then I will change my mind then. It's not like anything significant happens either, plus there are usually only an average of 3-9 users online a day.
(03-29-2012, 04:03 PM)RubiksHQ Wrote: [ -> ]plus there are usually only an average of 3-9 users online a day.
There are plenty more than that.
(03-29-2012, 05:21 PM)Crayo Wrote: [ -> ]There are plenty more than that.
Okay, fine: 5-15. Seems more reasonable, I guess, and I'm counting the registered users, not guests.
(03-29-2012, 05:31 PM)RubiksHQ Wrote: [ -> ]Okay, fine: 5-15. Seems more reasonable, I guess, and I'm counting the registered users, not guests.
Perhaps within a period of 10-15 minutes, but for the full day no, i'd say 30-50 is more reasonable, and if you take out all of the guests that visit per day (100's).
Yea, we have lots of guest members visiting, I don't know why they don't register :O
I say breshiie hes very hq and helpful
(04-06-2012, 06:20 AM)Cronus Wrote: [ -> ]Sneaky backlink. Lol.
Ignore that post. It's just a bot.