10-17-2014, 12:22 PM
10-17-2014, 12:37 PM
(10-17-2014, 10:49 AM)Aura Wrote: [ -> ]There's also the risk of seeing many members register, and make LQ posts (or leech) in order to get 100 posts, grab the award and leave right after. I don't know how the attribution process of that award was working too. Were the posts and threads made by the user reviewed by Omni or the Staff to make sure that he really deserved that award or not?
I would honestly think Omniscient did review everyone's profile because you had to PM him stating you had 100 posts. Assuming that he checked your account himself instead throwing the award at you.
10-17-2014, 04:06 PM
(10-17-2014, 12:22 PM)Robust Wrote: [ -> ]I'd make the award recurring if anything. Perhaps a decent 30 posts a month or something, and automate it to prevent the trouble?
That would be a lot of work to even code something , or even make staff on either site just to look.
Honestly, the award shouldn't come back until there is a decent amount of activity within the site. Yes it's a great advertising tool but how many active members on here atm? lol.
If Omni reopened the award, the site would just be spammed.
10-18-2014, 12:29 PM
(10-17-2014, 04:06 PM)Zachary Wrote: [ -> ](10-17-2014, 12:22 PM)Robust Wrote: [ -> ]I'd make the award recurring if anything. Perhaps a decent 30 posts a month or something, and automate it to prevent the trouble?
That would be a lot of work to even code something , or even make staff on either site just to look.
Honestly, the award shouldn't come back until there is a decent amount of activity within the site. Yes it's a great advertising tool but how many active members on here atm? lol.
If Omni reopened the award, the site would just be spammed.
You make no sense. It's a marketing tactic if you like. It's to attract members. It has nothing to do with how many active members there are already? There are actually quite a number, and if there's already activity there's no point of an award...