Support Forums

I saw you post this on TechLife, good release I guess. Although I can't really see the point in this, too many unneeded features.

(12-12-2011, 12:54 PM)BreShiE Wrote: [ -> ]I saw you post this on TechLife, good release I guess. Although I can't really see the point in this, too many unneeded features.

Dam the general public is hard to please, "too many options", "Not enough options"....

lmfao...


Different forums, different points of view i suppose...

No I was just saying, I can't see why the Site URl and Username could be of use? But never-the-less it's quite a nice program.

Would you be interested in joining the SF Coders?

(12-12-2011, 01:10 PM)BreShiE Wrote: [ -> ]No I was just saying, I can't see why the Site URl and Username could be of use? But never-the-less it's quite a nice program.

Would you be interested in joining the SF Coders?

Oh

I mainly added it for ref, i have like 30 + regular sites... :/ After a ccleaner wipe, i hated having to go find password resets for all my accounts..

Anyway I would be interested in joining SF Coders.. Whats involved?

Maby i am posting a little later but anyway...

This is a very helpfull program


Can you please also help me?
I am trying to save listview items as you are saving them here.
Can you please tell me the method how to do this?

Thanks anyway.

What form of encryption do you use?

Also, to anybody who is interested in using this I suggest this: don't. I suggest LastPass instead. Who knows how easy it is to crack the encryption (if any) he used? And all your passwords could be as vulnerable as keeping them in a .txt

It isn't a bad program, but people need to be cautious.

(01-07-2012, 12:57 PM)Laugh Wrote: [ -> ]What form of encryption do you use?

Also, to anybody who is interested in using this I suggest this: don't. I suggest LastPass instead. Who knows how easy it is to crack the encryption (if any) he used? And all your passwords could be as vulnerable as keeping them in a .txt

It isn't a bad program, but people need to be cautious.

I've never tried his program but you could define your own encryption method to encrypt the bytes of a text file for example, and have it exported where ever you want to save it, then when it needs to read the file, decrypt the bytes and store the information about the decrypted information in memory while it gets read to the application. No need to decrypt and save the file at all every time that way, so even if you have the application running it's much secure. If you add your own key for example and you split the bytes to have it created from an IV, or had a certain number of bytes read to create the key then load the rest into the encryption, I think as long as it's personal you'd be fine. That would be the next step to this application though however if he doesn't have something decent to start with.

Then it would just be based off a master login to make sure that not everyone could just load the application to decrypt everything.

He's an alright programmer though, i'm sure he could figure something out if he continued development on this, and this program isn't just left 'as is'.

(01-07-2012, 12:57 PM)Laugh Wrote: [ -> ]What form of encryption do you use?

Also, to anybody who is interested in using this I suggest this: don't. I suggest LastPass instead. Who knows how easy it is to crack the encryption (if any) he used? And all your passwords could be as vulnerable as keeping them in a .txt

It isn't a bad program, but people need to be cautious.

Lets just put it this way it encrypts it in such a way you won't be able to crack it. and even if you had cloud computing power at hand it would still take 15million years.... lol, Estimated from the encryption...

The password in the text file is in a encrypted format, so you would not be able to unencrypt it unless you know the key, and way in which i encrypted it, I felt that local storage was also a good way to go as i don't want another source(web) to have access to the passwords.

I am glad tho you are warning other users, its always good to be aware of frauds and fakes etc, but i am neither

Haha sorry to seem like I was accusing you. You could be neither a fraud or fake and still have flaws in your security, which is what I meant