(10-01-2011, 06:28 PM)Grumpy Wrote: [ -> ]Definitely not needed for this type of forum, IMO. Sorry, but -1 from me.
You're obviously just another LQ spammer who didn't read the whole post of my reasoning. Go back, read the post, then see what you think.
(10-02-2011, 07:45 AM)BreShiE Wrote: [ -> ]You're obviously just another LQ spammer who didn't read the whole post of my reasoning. Go back, read the post, then see what you think.
You're not much better, stop being an butthead. He didn't like the idea, so he posted his opinion. Don't get angry when others disagree with you.
(10-02-2011, 10:49 AM)Laugh Wrote: [ -> ]You're not much better, stop being an butthead. He didn't like the idea, so he posted his opinion. Don't get angry when others disagree with you.
I'm not angry, I just said to actually read the post
THEN post what he thinks. I bet if you ask him to argue his point, he wont be able to because he hasn't read the post.
Also I'm not a LQ spammer, wont makes you think that?
This is a pretty good idea. It worked out great on HF
hmm.... Good idea it helps all the members to see every one's number of reported posts.
From my experiences as Staff, you can easily notice frequent and accurate reporters. Probably not needed at the moment buddy.
Would be a nice additon, but it's not needed.
I like this idea and hope it gets implimented