Support Forums

(07-25-2011, 11:08 AM)Believable Wrote: [ -> ]Message Boxes are easier with VB6

Code:

MsgBox "This is the body of the message", vbInformation, "This is the title"

This is what this would do:

Ok, maybe I should start trying to learn VB6, or should I just stick with .NET?
Thanks.

VB6 in my books is much better, it has barely any dependencies and is very stable, some of the best 'hacking tools' out there is made in VB6

For example:

HostBooter
BlackShades

This is really easy to do but none the less it looks good and I am sure some people can find it useful..

Stick to VB.NET as rumors are going around that VB6 will not work on windows 8.

One click copy for the IP results, a history or memory tool that shows sites you have looked up before?

This looks good, very simple but good!

(07-25-2011, 12:03 PM)Believable Wrote: [ -> ]VB6 in my books is much better, it has barely any dependencies and is very stable, some of the best 'hacking tools' out there is made in VB6

For example:

HostBooter
BlackShades

pointless stay with VB.net or move to C++

ass Vb6 is old now and when window 8 comes out it will not be compatible.

but venomz if you need help with coding hit me up.

Isnt there already like 1000 Programs that can do that?

Yeah there are, it's really simple to make too .

(07-25-2011, 11:08 AM)Believable Wrote: [ -> ]Message Boxes are easier with VB6

Code:

MsgBox "This is the body of the message", vbInformation, "This is the title"

This is what this would do:

(07-25-2011, 12:03 PM)Believable Wrote: [ -> ]VB6 in my books is much better, it has barely any dependencies and is very stable, some of the best 'hacking tools' out there is made in VB6

For example:

HostBooter
BlackShades

That's not any easier than later VB.


Virtually the exact same thing, only I use MessageBox.Show. Much more advaned, and more syntax options:

VB6 is horrible, and it's not any better just because a couple "good" tools were coded with it. It's all in the programmer himself/herself.

On SF though, tools like that can't be featured, as it's against the rules compared to what is allowed on HF

I'd agree with the ping though. Add an option for ping information > ping response time for example.

---

Here's a quick test project I put together in 5 mins:

pinger
history
whois
That's it.