Here is Version 1:
Here is Version 2:
Leave some criticism.
TraZ,
To be honest I would just scrap this piece there isn't really anything good about it, sorry
The colours are horrible together.
(08-28-2010, 11:10 AM)Untouch Wrote: [ -> ]To be honest I would just scrap this piece there isn't really anything good about it, sorry
The colours are horrible together.
People on other forums thought it was nice, but I guess thats your opinion, it doesn't bother me, it just helps me. Thanks.
yea im not really likin this one either
(08-28-2010, 12:38 PM)bkotz Wrote: [ -> ]yea im not really likin this one either
too feminine?
it just needs alot of work
i guess it could be considered feminin but iv made some feminin looking sigs b4
theres nothing wrong with that
idk im just not feeling this one
I agree it does need some work, not a fan of the color choice and dane cook just kinda looks like he doesn't belong but it does get a 10/10 anyway because Dane Cook is flipin funny.
(08-28-2010, 01:21 PM)sLeepyK0z Wrote: [ -> ]I agree it does need some work, not a fan of the color choice and dane cook just kinda looks like he doesn't belong but it does get a 10/10 anyway because Dane Cook is flipin funny.
Thanks for the feedback, but could you tell me how to improve it?
I think this is abit all over the place, although I like the stock and stars
(08-28-2010, 01:53 PM)Crysis. Wrote: [ -> ]I think this is abit all over the place, although I like the stock and stars
There isn't a stock.